The Fundamentals of

Flow Manufacturing

 

A White paper prepared in cooperation with

 

 

 

 

 

Acknowledgements

This paper is the result of a collaborative effort between the Business Process Consulting Group (BPCG) and J.D. Edwards.

The J.D. Edwards’ team would like to thank Bob Shepka, Dennis Hobbs, Gerard Leone, Gizane Indart, Laura Wagner, and John Moriarty from BPCG for their invaluable help.

BPCG gives a special thanks to the folks at J.D. Edwards for their assistance and contributions, especially Dave Parrish, Jean Marie Thompson, Mark Kazlauskas, Mike Hennessey, and Randy Sell.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements    *

What is "flow" manufacturing?    *

Where did the concept of "flow" come from?        *

Why do companies use "Flow"?  *

What industries use flow manufacturing today?    *

How do I recognize "Flow" when I see it?     *

What are the system requirements to support "flow"?  *

Conclusion         *

Introduction

Flow manufacturing & flow processing methodologies have gained a great deal of popularity over the last decade. During the last 5 years as flow practitioners began reporting significant benefits, more and more companies have started to research in earnest how flow processing could positively impact their business. Some of the benefits realized by companies who have adopted "flow" techniques include:

·         Inventory reduction

·         Quality improvements

·         Improved response time to customer requirements

·         Reduction of the working capital needed to run a business

·         Increased productivity

·         Floor space and capital asset utilization improvement

All of these companies have one thing in common: the desire to achieve a competitive advantage to increase their market share. They all know their customers expect high quality products, delivered on time, configured to specification. They realize more and more of their customers are no longer brand loyal and will seek out the supplier who can best meet their requirements.

Pro-active companies are not discouraged by this challenge. Rather, they see the ability to meet or exceed their customers’ expectations as a significant differentiation from their competitors. A growing number of companies are looking at flow processing as the method to help them achieve this competitive advantage.

Flow production is not a new concept. Although the "flow" solution is surprisingly simple, many interpretations exist as to what flow processing is. This is particularly true when used for manufacturing applications. The "flow" type of manufacturing has been labeled in many ways. These are just a few:

·         Assembly line manufacturing

·         Continuous flow manufacturing (CFM)

·         Repetitive manufacturing

·         Just-in-Time (JIT)

·         Lean manufacturing

·         Agile manufacturing

·         Toyota Production System (TPS)

·         Kanban manufacturing

·         Cellular (or cell) manufacturing

·         Demand Flow Manufacturing

"Flow" manufacturing contains elements from all these activities and programs. Unfortunately, just the label "flow" manufacturing can be as misleading and inconsistent as any of the labels listed above.

Any manufacturing method must be consistent and repeatable. The "flow" manufacturing techniques presented in this paper are consistent, repeatable, and have been implemented worldwide for the production of many different kinds of products.

This paper is an explanation of fundamental flow manufacturing and administrative processing techniques. It was created to help develop a clear understanding of flow concepts and to define flow terminology.

What is "flow" manufacturing?

"Flow" in manufacturing is a technique that causes product to be produced one unit at a time, at a formulated rate, without wait time, queue time, or other delays. Thought of as a pipeline, a product progresses through its manufacturing processes without stopping, hence the term "flow".

The sum of the work time required to progress through the flow manufacturing processes is almost always shorter than the time required to route products through a factory in batches. Significant reduction in manufacturing lead-time drives the benefits associated with flow processing. It is from this ability to produce a product closer to its actual work content time that the benefits of flow processing are realized.

The goal of the flow manufacturer is to establish and design a manufacturing line capable of producing multiple products, one at a time, using only the amount of time required to actually build the product. Wait time, queue time, and other delays are eliminated in flow manufacturing.

The rate at which work progresses through the factory is called a "flow rate" or "Takt". The "flow" of a product is achieved by causing all of its work tasks to be grouped and balanced to a formulated Takt time. A single unit of work (a Takt time’s worth) is performed by a person and/or a machine. The partially completed unit is then passed to the next resource down the line where another "Takt" worth of work tasks are performed. The unit of work progresses in a flow through all the manufacturing processes until all of the required work has been completed.

Work tasks are grouped together to a formulated Takt time.

This establishes the flow rate of a product.

Often, flow manufacturers may choose to change the output of the line to closer match the mix and volume of customer requirements. With a flow line designed to produce products using a formulated Takt time, the flow manufacturer has the ability to regulate the "rate" of the line. This rate is identified every day based on that day’s customer requirements. The rate of production is adjusted by changing the number of labor resources on the line. This causes Takt times to be missed or gained. The number of Takt times missed or gained is matched to the number of units required that day. The ability to change output rate every day, driven by changes in customer order requirements, is a powerful tool for managing both work in process and finished goods inventories.

It is extremely difficult to match workloads across manufacturing departments.

Overcoming Capacity Imbalances

Grouping similar types of work and machines together create traditional departments and work centers. This grouping of work and machines assists with organizational control and facilitates the collection of performance, routing, and inventory reporting data. In most cases, the similar work and machines are then geographically located in one area of the facility. In most cases, this grouping of work or machines provides little consideration for the equal distribution of capacity. This unequal distribution of capacity can create imbalances between manufacturing processes. These imbalances are often manifested in pools of excess inventory.

"Flow lines" overcome this imbalance problem. Flow lines are progressive assembly lines established with a facility layout allowing standard work tasks to be accomplished in a sequential and progressive manner. Where possible, all the processes necessary to produce a product are physically linked together. The physical arrangement of the resources is important as it allows work tasks to be distributed, accumulated, and balanced evenly throughout the entire manufacturing cycle.

Balancing to Takt and physically linking manufacturing processes together so the completed output of one process can be directly consumed by another dramatically reduces inventories and cycle times. Because manufacturing processes are simply divided into equal elements of work, grouping of similar labor and machines into a department no longer seem necessary. Only the resources necessary to produce the requirements are located on the line.

Without imbalanced departments, pools of work in process cannot accumulate. Also, the balancing and linking of all processes allow products to be produced in the work content time only. The normal wait and queue times for products that are routed in batches through the different manufacturing departments is eliminated.

Physically linking manufacturing processes together so the completed output of one process can be directly consumed into the next dramatically reduces inventories and cycle times.

Product Families Based on Common Processes and Materials

Many manufacturers produce products by families. These families define which products will be run on which production line. This family designation often dictates the dedication of manufacturing resources to specific products and production lines. In most cases, these families have not been defined by manufacturing. Family definitions are usually reserved for the Sales, Marketing, or Financial groups with little regard given to the actual manufacturing requirements of the product.

Flow manufacturers also produce products using a family definition. However, family member selections for multi-product flow lines are based first on the commonality of their processing paths or "Process Flow Definition". Further selections are based on similar work element times and the commonality of work steps and materials used. Flow production lines are optimally designed to produce a "family" of similar products which all share common manufacturing processes and materials. By grouping products in this manner, all family members can advance through their required resources one unit at a time.

Producing multiple products on the same line has many benefits for the flow manufacturer. A multi-product line has the ability to produce many products in the same shop floor footprint. This is important to the flow manufacturer to alleviate the costs of bricks and mortar expansion. It is common that different products have different sales cycles. If product lines are dedicated to fewer product types, alternating sales cycles can lead to the "hire/fire" of employees in an attempt to match production capacity to customer requirements. The more products run on a single line, the less the impact of alternating demand.

Producing multiple products on the same line reduces the impact of demand fluctuations

Production and Material Signaling

There are two primary resources needed to produce any product: labor and material. Flow manufacturers balance and link their manufacturing processes together, staffing those resources to customer requirements to produce products. Material required to build product is placed into the flow lines utilizing a technique called Kanban. The Kanban system utilizes a series of signals to indicate when parts are needed for production.

The Kanban methodology is a material presentation method designed to simplify material handling and inventory management. Instead of purchased materials being placed in "kits" and issued to production based on a production schedule, materials are instead associated with a Kanban or "signal".

Backflushing simplifies inventory transactions


Kanban systems require fewer inventory transactions and reduce the amount of system maintenance activities normally required to keep up with the real time environment of the shop floor. Materials from suppliers are transacted into stores or directly into an in-process location. Material is then relieved from "in-process" using a "Backflush" transaction. The Backflush transaction reduces the available on-hand inventory in the "in-process" location by deducting the purchased material content of a product’s Bill of Material.

 

The Backflush transaction occurs after all work to build the product is finished and all required purchased materials are consumed into the end item. Simplifying the material input and output transactions cause the on-hand inventory to be highly accurate. Many flow manufactures have eliminated cycle counting and physical inventorying unless mandated by regulations.

A Kanban system that places materials directly on the flow line where it is consumed into the product offers several advantages to the flow manufacturer. All material that resides on the line is available for use on any product. Materials are available for consumption into any product that requires their use. Because components are not assigned to a specific shop order and are already on the line, any product demanded by the customer can be manufactured immediately, in its work element time. In a Kanban system, parts do not need to be "de-allocated’ from one shop order and re-allocated to another.

The capability for all material in the manufacturing inventory pool to be available for any requirement gives the flow manufacturer a great deal of flexibility in rapidly meeting customer needs. Kanban systems provide the flexibility to insure a rapid response time to the customer.

By using "supermarket" stocking locations, material shortages are virtually eliminated from the shop floor. As opposed to an item on a shortage report hidden away on a desk, the Kanban signal is a card, bin, basket, pallet, cart, or other designated physical signal that is difficult to ignore. When a Kanban container is empty, there is no inventory accuracy debate.


Kanban signaling dramatically improves customer response and inventory accuracy

In a Kanban system, a relationship that identifies where materials are used and where they are refilled must be established. These relationships are known as "Kanban Points, Kanban Links, and Kanban Chains. When Kanban material has been consumed by the building of product, a Kanban signal is created. The empty Kanban "signals" the need to refill or replace the materials used. This signal can be a card or the empty container itself.

A refilling point for material used on the production line will be located within a short distance from the line. The designated pull paths identify the "used at" and "refilled from" locations of Kanban material for the material handler performing the actual replenishment. Empty Kanbans are refilled from a designated "supermarket" location. In turn, supermarket Kanbans are then refilled either from stores or the supplier directly. If suppliers are qualified, materials can be delivered directly to the supermarket location.

A goal of any Kanban system is to keep inventory moving through the manufacturing process at a rapid pace. This velocity is intended to improve the turn rate usage of the inventory investment and to reduce the working capital requirements of the business. The key to this rapid turning of inventory is the frequency of replenishment of the Kanbans. Empty Kanbans must be refilled using a predetermined "Delivery Frequency".

The Delivery Frequency is established for each pull path for each part or component. The amount of inventory investment is in proportion to how often material is replenished. The longer the replenishment times the greater the inventory investment. Conversely, more frequent replenishment means smaller inventory. More frequent replenishment also means more material handling time. While tempting to think only of reduced inventories, Kanban systems must establish the optimum strategy to balance between inventory investment and material handling costs.

Scheduling production in a "flow" factory is also significantly simplified once the factory layout and Kanban signaling drive the flow of work through the factory.

Production planning on a flow line occurs at the finished goods level. Subassemblies are produced on feeder processes. There is no need to schedule subassembly production as the output from these feeder processes is consumed directly by downstream processes.

Another type of Kanban is used to signal the next unit of production on the flow line. An "in-process Kanban" is used to signal the next unit in sequence.

Kanban signaling generates the communication to the shop floor when to begin work on a specific product. Products are planned into the flow line one unit at a time in a specific sequence to insure a balanced "flow" of work through the factory.


Because products are manufactured one piece at a time, they can be sequenced to move down the flow line in the same order as customer requirements is received. The planner has only to determine the order of manufacture. The person in the first workstation in the flow line, upon receiving an empty In-Process Kanban as a signal, simply begins production of the next unit in the same order the planner has chosen.

Configure-to-Order custom products may require a sales order configuration document be sequenced with the product. This Configuration Traveler flows along with the product as it advances through manufacturing. Lead-time through the factory is so significantly reduced that shop floor tracking and expediting can be eliminated.

Manufacturing Lead-time is generally measured by determining the critical path through the multi-level Bill of Material for a product. Manufacturing "response-time" in a "flow" factory is measured by determining the critical time line through the process relationships required to build the product.

The length of lead-time through a factory has a direct and predictable impact on the amount of in-process inventory that will exist.

What is "flow processing" within a business’s administrative processes?

The same dynamics of flow manufacturing seen on the shop floor can be seen in the administrative processes in the back office. The concepts of linking and balancing processes together will yield the same results. Even though office processes are not normally thought of as a product, the type of processes used to accomplish tasks is the same.

In offices, the same department methodologies exist. These departments are isolated and located remotely throughout the business. All work performed in these processes use the same logic as the batch manufacturer. Work usually proceeds in "batches". Most of the processing time is the move time between departments and time spent waiting to be processed. The actual work content time to do the work is the smallest component of lead-time. Administrative batch processing generally results in the same levels of inventory as manufacturing batch processing. The only difference between manufacturing and administration inventory is that the administrative work in process inventory resides in in-boxes on someone’s desk or as electronic files instead of on pallets or in containers on the manufacturing floor.

It is conceivable that the time required to complete administrative "paperwork" is often greater than the time necessary to manufacture the product. Could the time required to process an administrative procedure be shortened if it is processed in its actual work content time instead of the time to actually do the work in addition to the time spent routing the work through all the various departments?

"Flow" in administrative processes is a work method that causes administrative tasks to be performed in a successive and progressing manner without wait time, queue time, or other delays. Administrative Flow processes are established in office areas that perform "repeatable" tasks that can be linked and balanced together in a sequential manner.

Where did the concept of "flow" come from?

Flow Manufacturing is not a new or radical concept for the new millennium, but it certainly is more sophisticated and better equipped than it was in the past.

When the industrial revolution began in the 1860’s, manufacturing was first challenged with the question of how to manage a machine and it’s enormous product output. Output that far out paced that of a person focused to the same task. These initial machines were focused toward the industries that revolved around the weaving of cloth. Any products requiring the shaping or cutting of metals were still extremely labor intensive and a major issue of management within these industries was the productivity of the workers.

Around 1885 these management issues were addressed when Frederick Winslow Taylor began publishing his work. What Taylor proposed was that all work should be broken down to individual tasks with a view that the tasks could be shortened or eliminated. The application of this scientific method coupled with the time study techniques introduced by Frank Gilbreth, let to maximum efficiency in industrial work. Taylor set about proving his methods in multiple industrial applications focused on finding the ‘one best way’.

A boost for his methods was given when Henry Ford began building large manufacturing facilities for his new motor cars. His first successful production model was the Model N, but his fame truly grew with the first full production year of the Model T in 1909. Ford proposed to build a car that would be affordable for every American. Key issues for this to be successful were productivity, cost, and availability of product. The issue of productivity was addressed by having the car pulled through the plant at a constant speed where groups of parts were accumulated for the workers to assemble. In this production line Ford had some workers doing one or two small tasks while others did more. Ford had proposed that ‘A man must not be hurried in his work’ so the timing of the individual tasks was critical.

Productivity was further increased when Ford introduced the moving assembly line for chassis assembly. Production time improved from 12 hours and 8 minutes to 1 hour and 33 minutes. Not only was productivity improved but the goals of cost reduction and increased availability were also achieved. The flow of the product and further productivity gains were made when Henry Ford announced that the Model T was now available in "Any color so long as it is black." A remarkable achievement during the production of the Model T was the fact that even as the production volume increased, the selling price was consistently reduced, beginning at $850 in 1909 and reduced to $260 in the final full production year of 1926.

Driven by customer demand, the challenge in manufacturing during the 1920’s became product variety. Many manufacturing facilities struggled to gear up for production of new product models. It was not unheard of for factories to be down for up to 6 months to establish new tooling. Up until this time, manufacturers focused primarily on labor productivity to achieve a competitive advantage. Innovations in technology became the new productivity tools that allowed many manufacturers to remain competitive. This period marked the advent of technological changes in machine tool cutting points, synthetic abrasives, and multiple rotary cutting points particularly in lathes and milling machines.

Manufacturing through the 1930’s and 1940’s was still driven by large quantity production runs, although runs similar to the 17 years of the Model T were no longer possible. Consumers were more and more the drivers of change in a product life cycle. As the 1950’s began, demand for specialized products started to take hold. Not only were products more specialized, but they also had limited life cycles. Batch manufacturing methods had arrived!

In batch manufacturing, quantities were often based upon what would make the machine productive and not necessarily what the market required. This subtle change in focus pitted manufacturing departments against marketing departments throughout industry. Batch manufacturing had allowed machines to become productive when large quantities of a product were built, but batch processes had created problems for manufacturing when trying to build a mix of products. Solutions to this dilemma were found in the discipline of Group Technology around the mid-1950’s. Group Technology proposed that manufacturing focus on the similarity of material shape, size, or method of manufacture. The focus on materials gave limited advantages, so the discipline was expanded to include machines and operations. This evolved into what we know as cellular manufacturing, where a group of machines and people have autonomous authority over all administration, planning, and operations to produce products.

Many companies in the United States pursued these disciplines while a different set of disciplines was being followed in Japan. Leading this charge was the Toyota Motor Company. At Toyota it was contended that the standard thinking of Cost + Profit = Sales Price was incorrect. They believed that Profit = Sales Price – Costs. From this premise Toyota began to create a manufacturing system that would focus on the management of costs. Cost became translated to waste and wastes of all varieties were targeted for elimination. Key areas that were targeted were work in process inventory and safety stock. While many companies in the United States and Europe were attempting to calculate the optimum batch sizes for production, Toyota worked toward the goal of being able to build a mix of products in a one-piece-flow. Building a mix of products in a one-piece-flow satisfied many key objectives of for Toyota: raising productivity, reducing costs, and fast customer response.

Through the 1960’s and into the 1970’s, these two schools of manufacturing continued down separate paths. One, looking for better ways to manage batch production, the other finding ways to allow one-piece-flow of a mix of products. Into the 1980’s many product markets within the United States and Europe came under pressure from foreign manufacturers. Products were being brought to market that were of higher quality and lower in price. Manufacturers began to look for better ways to compete. Many abandoned batch manufacturing in favor of the more responsive method of flow manufacturing to pursue the goal of being able to flow products one at a time in a mix.

Flow Processing today is a proven technique that allows work to be performed without bottlenecks or delays. By linking and balancing work steps to enable products to flow one at a time, manufacturers are achieving significant results. Although the products may vary in volume, in type, and in mix, the techniques remain the same: definition of the processing flow of a product, standard work definition at a detail level, and designing the production flow line. When the line has been designed for product flow, a set of tools that balance the work to a calculated flow rate or "Takt" are employed. As the design and balance of the line is completed, the flow of material and calculation of material quantities, using Kanban techniques, are executed. Using these basic tools, a flow processing line can be created and implemented.

Why do companies use "Flow"?

Manufacturers on a global basis have had to address productivity increases, operating cost reductions, quality improvements, and shortened customer lead-times. Many companies have chosen the tools of flow processing as a solution to these issues.

Inherent in the methods of flow processing is a series of behaviors that can influence improvements in all the aforementioned areas.

Productivity Improvement

The quantity of units produced by a team of people in a given period of time is generally accepted as the measurement of a factory's productivity. The tools of flow processing include continuous process improvement strategies (known as Kaizen programs in Japan) that focus on the reduction of wait time, queue time, and other non-value-adding activities. By eliminating wasteful time elements, production employees can spend more time producing products. Productivity improvement is a natural byproduct of flow processing.

Operating Cost Reduction

A flow factory's operating costs are reduced as a result of the following factors:

·         Total Quality Management (TQM) activities that improve process quality, reduce scrap, rework, and warranty costs.

·         Inventory reduction as a direct result of shortened manufacturing lead-time.

·         Improved resource and floor space utilization through the elimination of waste and unnecessary inventory

Shortened Customer lead-time

The marketplace is expecting a significantly shorter order fulfillment lead-time than it did a decade ago. A factory that arranges its resources in a flow relationship creates, by default, a significantly shorter manufacturing lead-time. The shorter the manufacturing lead-time, the quicker the response to a customer order without having to carry finished goods or work in process inventory.

Operational Benefits

Production planning in a flow line is simplified. Planning occurs at the shippable product level. Subassembly production planning is virtually eliminated. Multi-level Bills of Material can be dramatically compressed or flattened. Varying the flow line’s staffing level controls the flow rate. The flow manufacturer tends to drive production planning to a make-to-order schedule. Actual customer orders drive the labor resources required in the production process each day.

Cost accounting methods can be simplified with flow processing. Because the lead-time through a flow facility is consistent, repeatable, and not volume sensitive, Activity Based Costing can easily be implemented. Labor costs can become elements of the overhead that is applied proportionally to each product. A variable overhead cost may also be created to account for extraordinary conversion costs driven by the use of special machines or resources.

The reporting in flow processing is simple and direct.

·         Actual backflush units versus planned completions

·         Kanban material usage variance

·         Resource utilization reporting

·         Supplier delivery frequency actual versus planned

What industries use flow manufacturing today?

Aerospace & Defense products

Injection molding and die casting

Automotive Assembly

Insulation materials

Automotive parts and accessories

Machine tools

Castings and forgings

Machining job shops

Ceramics

Material handling equipment

Clothing and shoes

Metal fabrications

Computers and peripherals

Medical equipment

Digital Imaging equipment

Photocopiers

Electric motors and controls

Paper products

Electronic / Circuit Card assembly

Pharmaceuticals

Fabrication job shops

Plastic resin

Glass products

Plumbing Products

HVAC products and accessories

Printing

Household appliances

Subcontracted assembly


How do I recognize "Flow" when I see it?

Following are some background and guidelines on how to identify a manufacturer that is using Flow Manufacturing techniques.

When walking into a factory for the first time, you are likely to find one of three basic types of manufacturing methodologies used to make products:

·         Process Manufacturing

·         Discrete Batch Manufacturing

·         Flow Manufacturing

Following is a description of some basic distinctive features of the three methodologies with special emphasis on Flow Manufacturing.

Process Manufacturing

This type of manufacturing tends to be the most highly automated. Upon arrival to a process factory, one of the first things observed is the size and apparent complexity of the machinery in use. The second distinctive aspect is that a limited number of people operate the factory. Factory layout is usually determined by the order of the processing steps required to make the products. Commonly only one type of product is being manufactured in a process at any given point in time.

In process factories, products are nearly always produced in units of measure that are not "Each". Typical units of measure in a process factory relate to:

·         Weight (Oz, Kg, Tons)

·         Linear measurements (Feet, Yards, Meters)

·         Surface measurements (Square Feet, Square Yard, Square Meter)

·         Volume measurements (Gallons, Quarts, Cubic Meters)

In process factories, it is plausible however, that the shipping unit of measure may be expressed in "Each".

Due to the nature of their conversion methods, process manufacturers already "flow" their products. What differentiates a process manufacturer from a Flow manufacturer is that production quantities are processed in batches or lots. These production lots are usually established following some sort of algorithm that focuses on resource utilization. Sometimes, however, they are the result of someone’s educated guess.

Process manufacturers could obtain significant benefits from the tools of flow processing. Inventory management both at the in-process level and finished goods level would be a point of focus. Two key aspects that a process manufacturer could benefit from are resource balancing and Kanban management.

Resource Balancing

In spite of the natural flow of production within any single process, it is likely that two or more adjacent processes will not be balanced. These imbalances have the potential of generating large amounts of semi-processed product. The balancing of resources to a Takt time will tie resource utilization to customer requirements. The use of in-process Kanbans will control the flow of product between processes, thus keeping inventories of semi-finished product at formulated levels.

Kanban

Material Kanban techniques could be used within the process to manage and control the transfer of semi-finished product from a supplying process to a consuming process in the factory. These replenishment techniques can also be applied for controlling supplied materials consumed at the required processes. Another common application is as a tool to signal the replenishment of finished goods inventory shipped to customers.

Discrete manufacturing

Discrete manufacturing is one of the most common production methodologies. Shippable end items are usually measured as "Each". Quantities produced in manufacturing can vary from a unit of one to large batch quantities. There are usually more people than machines used to convert the purchased material required to make products.

Factories typically have their resources arranged in departments or work centers. These areas consist of resources – (people and machines) grouped together based upon the kind of work they perform or the machines they use. Factory layout may appear to lack a logical relationship. The movement of materials between resources may look disorganized, and the distances traveled by those materials may be relatively long. The only common thread across departments is the similarity of work or machines within a department. Because semi-finished products have to travel across departmental boundaries, large quantities of inventory typically build up throughout the factory.

This functional organization or resources has its roots in the need to organize manufacturing so as to facilitate the collection of earned hours for people and machines. This data is later used to track efficiencies and for the absorption of overhead dollars. The grouping of resources into departments pays little or no attention to the need of balancing the work across resources. When observing a typical discrete batch manufacturer, you will see that each resource works to its "own beat". Individual resources have no regard for the supplying process’s ability to feed or the consuming process’s ability to consume.

For material replenishment, discrete batch manufacturers generally resort to the use of pick-lists based of the latest MRP run. Once customer orders are entered into the system, they will take part in the generation of net requirements. These net requirements will call for the allocation of materials to the associated work order, shop order, or schedule. The timing of entry of a customer order into the system determines when the materials will be allocated to the order. This could turn into a "battle of wits" among production schedulers trying to get their orders first in line. This allocation methodology is almost guaranteed to cause material imbalances resulting in shortages.

Flow manufacturing   

When you enter a flow manufacturing facility, you will immediately notice how organized the factory appears. You will also notice that most operators are building product, not moving it. A deeper look into the flow factory will reveal:

Resources are linked

In sheer contrast with the discrete batch manufacturer, the manufacturing resources in the flow factory are not arranged in functional departments or work centers. The Flow factory layout follows the sequence of manufacturing processes required to make a product family. There are signals in between resources called In-Process Kanbans. These signals regulate the product flow as downstream workstations pull the semi-finished unit from the In-Process Kanbans. Resources within a production line appear to be balanced, and products move at a relatively constant pace. In a flow factory, you can tell how a product is made by simply looking at the production line that makes it.

Products move

In a flow factory, products are manufactured in a progressive fashion, accumulating work as they are moved from workstation to workstation. The most likely unit of material transfer is one unit of product at a time. However, there are cases in which it might make sense to transfer more than one unit of product at a time (one customer order could be for two units). In a flow operation, accumulation of semi-finished product in between workstations is highly unlikely. The only valid accumulation of inventory would be for balancing a resource whose work cannot be broken down in Takt time increments. Even in such cases, the amount of inventory is calculated and kept constant. It is also very likely that you will see a variety of products being built at any point in time in a manufacturing process.

People move

The flow process does not "chain" the person to the workstation or the machine. In order to throttle the line up or down in response to customer requirements, people are placed into or removed from the flow line. As the Multi-Product Flow line operates with less than the full compliment of people each day, the people building product will "move" from workstation to workstation to overcome any understaffing. Highly flexible and cross-trained employees are a key source of productivity in flow processing.

Materials move

Supplied materials consumed by the various resources involved in making a family of products are available at the line in material Kanbans for the operators to consume. In the most likely scenario, the majority of parts are within the operator’s reach or very close by. As materials are consumed, the on-hand inventory at the line is depleted and a signal is generated for replenishment. Once the container, gaylord, or pallet is removed from the workstation, the operator is left with a secondary quantity of material. This extra inventory will allow the operator to continue to work while the Kanban is replenished. The use of Kanban in the flow factory has resulted in the virtual elimination of material shortages on the line.

Everything has a place

In the flow factory, orderliness and neatness are critical parts of everyone’s working environment. All material locations are clearly marked. Only the necessary tools, fixtures, gauges, and other resources are present at the workstations. No noticeable clutter or mess is accepted.

No Inspection department

Production employees in a flow factory frequently use a series of graphic work instructions. These graphical renderings are color coded to emphasize quality. Employees do not rush through their work; they take the appropriate time to ensure that the units transferred to the next downstream workstation are of perfect quality. Since quality is built into every product, units do not have to be inspected, unless regulations require it.

Employee satisfaction is high

Because of the requirement to move with the flow of the product, operators receive extensive amount of training in a variety of jobs. Operators also participate in Kaizen (Continuous Process Improvement) activities resulting from their daily feedback to production management. The supervision required is significantly decreased because of the line design. The product flow indicates what to do and when to do it. The operators in a flow factory are highly motivated and nearly self-managed.

Visual queues

By simply taking a walk through the factory floor in a flow facility, you can easily tell what is going on. Sequencing boards at the head of each line clearly communicate the product mix to be built that day. At the end of each line, the output rate variation is posted along with the flow rate, indicating how the line is doing so far for that day. The Kanban boards indicate how much material is turning and highlight any potential shortages. At the end of the day, the In-Process Kanbans and workstations will tell us if the line was under or over-staffed. Furthermore, the operators performing work will provide key information on the line’s balance.

Planning is simple

Because the line can build a family of products at high speeds, the planning methodology revolves around sequencing customer orders to the line on a daily basis. Gone are the games played with forecasts and non-firm orders. Once an order hits the manufacturing floor, it will be completed within the product’s Flow-Based Response Time.

What are the system requirements to support "flow"?

Introduction

Any company that has decided to implement "flow" manufacturing or is trying to manage an existing flow environment will have some very specific system software functionality needs. These requirements are driven by significant differences between discrete production and "flow" production techniques. There are two timelines that software functionality must follow to support flow: initial factory design and daily production execution.

Factory Design

A flow factory is developed from information that is unique to this type of manufacturing. Information elements that are required to develop a "Multi-Product" Flow line are:

·         "Process Flow Definitions": The identification of each end item’s work flow relationships. A Process Flow Definition is used to record the specific sequence of the resources (labor and /or machines) that are used to produce an end item.

·         "Process Flow Definition Map": The listing of each end item’s Process Flow Definition in a matrix format (PFD Map). Mapping leads to the development of end item families.

·         "Multi-Product family definition": The analysis and creation of families of end items that share common or similar Process Flow Definitions. Multi-Product family definitions are used to create the shop floor layout of workstations and machines for the Multi-Product Flow line.

·         "Standard Work Definitions": The documentation of the work steps required to build a product. SWD’s are used for creating work definition at each workstation and machine. They are also used for training employees.

·         "Standard Work Definition time map": The recording of every SWD for each end item intended to be built in the flow line. Time mapping is used for "banding" Multi-Product end item’s by the amount of time that their work takes. This is helpful for flow line resource balancing.

·         "Forecasted Volume": An estimate of the daily production volume for each end item that the Multi-Product Flow line should be designed to produce. The estimates are used for determining the flow line’s Takt time.

·         "Takt": The maximum theoretical production rate for the factory. Takt is used as part of the basis to determine how many people and / or machines will be required in the factory. Takt is a time / volume relationship.

·         "Throughput Volume Adjustments": The analysis and calculation of volume adjustments to Takt time because of the impact of scrap or rework at any point in the flow line. Analysis is performed to insure that enough factory resources are in place.

·         "Rework, Scrap, and Option map": A matrix that will be used to record information for each end item’s rework percentage by process, scrapping locations, the amount lost, and option percentages if applicable. This information is used to determine if adjustments to an end item’s throughput volume will be required in any of its processes.

·         "Multi-Product Flow line resource calculations": The determination of the number of people and / or machines needed in the factory to support the forecasted volume of end items.

·         "Multi-Product Flow layout": The analysis and development of the optimal factory layout. Factory re-layout is often needed to optimize a factory’s shortest response time.

·         "Workstation Definition": Work element balancing among resources – A line design objective is to divide work steps evenly among the workstations designed into the flow line. Work step division is based on Takt.

·         "Graphic Work Instructions": Pictorial renderings of Total Quality Management information. Graphic Work Instructions translate "text based" Standard Work Definitions into easy to understand pictures that employees will use to perform in-line quality checks.

·         Kanban: The material supply technique based on a simple signal. Kanbans are used to provide the required materials to the appropriate places on the shop floor. "Used at" and "refilled from" locations are established on the factory floor and are called "pull paths". Three types of Kanbans are generally used: In-process, two bin, and one-time use.

·         Reports         

·         Line design resource requirements

·         From / to throughput table by process and cell

·         Flow line design maps

·         Workstation Definitions

·         Materials used at a workstation or machine

Daily production execution requirements

Daily and ongoing support is required after the flow line is developed.

·         "Backflush": Inventory management transfer / move transactions. Purchased material required to build an end item product are deducted or moved from an "in-process" inventory account into the "Finished Goods Inventory" account by using the product’s Bill of Material.

·         Flow Production Planning: The daily planning, scheduling, and sequencing of customer requirements into production. Daily production planning determines if the proposed production plan can be support by the flow line’s available resources and materials. If the plan cannot be supported, further scheduling into the most appropriate time slots is required. Work flows through the line’s resources one end-item’s worth at a time. The specific sequence that work flows through the factory is important for line balancing.

Daily flow line performance reporting

·         Backflush reporting (End-of-Line and Process)

·         Kanban shortage reporting

·         Resource utilization reporting

·         Daily Report of planned production.

Ongoing Support

·         "Flow Based Response Time": The shortest, optimal flow path through the factory resources. Flow Based Response Time (FBRT) drives customer support and inventory strategies. Flow Based Response Time is like a critical path analysis, but it does not use a Bill Of Material.

·         Kanban resizing: The recalculation of material Kanban quantities caused by a change in usage requirements.

Periodic flow line performance reporting

·         Actual Backflush versus planned

·         Kanban material usage variance

·         Resource utilization reporting

·         Supplier Delivery Frequency actual versus planned

·         Calculated Flow Based Response Time (FBRT) versus actual

Conclusion

BPCG and J.D. Edwards are committed to flow manufacturing. This document has presented an explanation of fundamental flow manufacturing and administrative processing techniques. Its intent was to help develop a clear understanding of flow concepts and terminology.

For additional information of J.D. Edwards flow software solutions, please contact them at:

J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company World Headquarters One Technology Way Denver, Colorado 80237, USA 800 727 5333 / 303 334 4000

J.D. Edwards UK Ltd. Serving Europe, the Middle East, and Africa Oxford Road Stokenchurch, High Wycombe Buckinghamshire HP14 3AD, UK 44 1494 682700

J.D. Edwards World Solutions Company Serving Latin America and the Caribbean 806 Douglas Entrance, Suite 570 Coral Gables, Florida 33134, USA 305 442 7800

J.D. Edwards Pte Ltd. Serving Asia Pacific No. 1 International Business Park The Synergy, #06-01/04 Singapore 609917 65 227 3391

www.jdedwards.com

 

The materials contained herein are summary in nature, subject to change, and intended for general information only. BPCG is a registered trademark of the Business Process Consulting Group, a division of Software Engineering Consults, Inc.

J.D. Edwards is a registered trademark of J.D. Edwards & Company. The names of all other products and services of J.D. Edwards used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of J.D. Edwards World Source Company. All other product names used are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.

 

 

TM

"Your Source for the Flow Processing Advantage"